NAIROBI,
Kenya — Confidence was so low in Kenya’s courts after its 2007 election
that people preferred to settle their disputes with machetes and bows
and arrows. After this year’s disputed presidential vote, there has been
no violence, in part because of the faith the country has in its
highest-ranking judge.
Chief
Justice Willy Mutunga will soon preside over the biggest case of his
short judicial career. Last weekend the country’s election commission
named Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta the winner of the March 4
presidential election with 50.07 percent of the vote.
Prime
Minister Raila Odinga is challenging that result, saying there has been
massive rigging. Odinga’s camp said Tuesday that the prime minister was
cheated out of 1.8 million votes, a margin that would give him an
outright win.
The
March 4 election was the first since postelection violence killed more
than 1,000 people in 2007-08. This postelection period has not seen any
violence. Odinga asked his supporters for calm, and Kenyans seem to have
more faith in their government.
Mutunga
on Monday said the election case would be heard “impartially, fairly
justly and without fear, ill-will, prejudice or bias and in accordance
with our constitution and our laws.”
Mutunga’s
career as a social and political activist has placed him near Kenya’s
top politicians for decades, and he’s shared his opinion on them. One
quote from the 2006 book “Raila Odinga: An Enigma in Kenyan Politics”
may become an issue for the case he soon presides over.
“I
am convinced Kenya’s transition needs Raila as the president of this
country,” author Babafemi A. Badejo quotes Mutunga as saying.
Mutunga
has been “a committed activist in the pro-democracy movement in Kenya
since the 1970s,” according to a biography posted on a Kenyan government
website.
Unlike
other judges in Kenya, many who know Mutunga believe his independence
is genuine, and is unlikely to be persuaded by bribes or threats. Mutuma
Rutere, of the Nairobi-based Center for Human Rights and Policy
Studies, said fairness is Mutunga’s “biggest asset.”
“There
is enough evidence that he can be depended upon to preside over this
issue in an independent manner,” said Rutere, who worked with Mutunga at
the Kenya Human Rights Commission. “His whole life has been about
promoting justice and democracy.”
Mutunga
knows Odinga well. In the late 1970s, as former Kenyan President Daniel
arap Moi consolidated his hold on power, Mutunga was jailed in 1982,
the same year Odinga was detained for alleged treason. Later the two
joined a pro-democracy group called the Young Turks.
In
the book “Raila Odinga,” Mutunga is quoted as saying Odinga “is a
nationalist and a patriot. He has always struggled against dictatorship
and oppression and been for social justice.”
“Though
it may sound contradictory, he is also an ethnic baron. He has not
sorted out this contradiction in his life. He uses both nationalist and
ethnic cards for the advancement of his political projects,” the book
quotes Mutunga as saying.
Kenya’s
2010 constitution was passed in the wake of the 2007-08 tribal
violence. It gives Odinga until Saturday to file his election petition
and Mutunga’s court two weeks to rule. Kenyatta cannot be sworn in until
the case is closed.
On
Tuesday, Odinga’s team said it is seeking an order from Kenya’s High
Court to compel the election commission to produce electoral registrars
and other documents used in the vote count. Odinga’s team says the
documents can help prove Odinga was cheated out of 1.8 million votes. It
said the election commission is operating under a cloak of secrecy.
“This
is a serious indictment on the integrity, ability and above all honesty
of the” election commission, Education Minister Mutula Kilonzo said.
Though
Mutunga has a reputation for fairness and independence, the Odinga case
will present new, difficult tests in a country with a history of
extra-judicial executions and unexplained disappearances. Even before
Kenyans voted, a letter attributed to a violent gang circulated
throughout the country warning of “dire consequences” if Kenyatta was
blocked from running.
Kenyatta
faces charges of crimes against humanity at The Hague-based
International Criminal Court, and his eligibility to run for president
was being tested in court.
“If
anybody, any candidate, any party, any agency, or any other actor
thinks that it will bend the ear, mind and resolve of this chief justice
to do anything that is unconstitutional or illegal, then they are
mistaken,” Mutunga said in statement in February.
Mutunga,
65, was born into a poor family among the Kamba people of Kenya’s
eastern province and has degrees from universities in Kenya and
Tanzania. He has taught constitutional law at the University of Nairobi.
After his 1983 release from prison he went into exile in Canada, where
he earned a doctorate in law at Toronto’s York University.
He
returned to Kenya in the early 1990s. Before being named chief justice,
he had never been a judge. He has spoken out in defense of
homosexuality in a deeply conservative society and is described as a
proponent of “neoliberal” judicial reform. He wears a stud in his left
ear, an item that became a publicly debated issue as he was named chief
justice.
Out
of 10 contenders for the job, Mutunga’s name was the only one forwarded
by the Judicial Service Commission to President Mwai Kibaki. Mutunga’s
appointment was approved by lawmakers in June 2011.
Gladwell
Otieno of the Africa Center for Open Governance, a pro-democracy group
in Nairobi, said Mutunga has been a good chief justice. She notes that
he is one of only six justices, however. A seventh seat is vacant,
opening the possibility of a split decision.
“Ever
since he took over the judiciary public confidence has been rising
steadily. It’s quite high now,” Otieno said. Odinga supporters “may
expect him to rule in their favor... but he’s not alone there and it
depends on the quality of evidence they present.”
Associated Press reporter Tom Odula in Nairobi, Kenya contributed to this report.
No comments:
Post a Comment