By PETER LEFTIE pmutibo@ke.nationmedia.com
Monday, June 3 2013
Monday, June 3 2013
In Summary
- What his answers lacked in specificity and masterly of national security, they appeared to make up with what Speaker Justin Muturi described as “passion”.
Mr Joseph ole Lenku — the little-known hotelier
nominated to the powerful position of Cabinet Secretary for Interior and
Coordination of National Government — presented a confident front when
he appeared before MPs for vetting Monday.
Mr Lenku, the general manager of Utalii Hotel, was
questioned during a vigorous session which reflected the general unease
that he might not have the experience and exposure for such a docket.
For nearly three hours, the 43-year old wrestled
with a barrage of questions from MPs on a wide range of issues including
spiralling insecurity, the turf wars between the Inspector General of
Police, Mr David Kimaiyo, and the National Police Service Commission
chairman, Mr Johnstone Kavuludi and the conflict between governors and
regional commissioners.
What his answers lacked in specificity and
masterly of national security, they appeared to make up with what
Speaker Justin Muturi described as “passion”.
MPs wanted to know whether he had the spine to
confront drug barons and whether he was prepared to resign if he failed
to tackle the myriad challenges facing the docket.
One of the MPs even told him to his face that he
was not impressed with his performance at the interview and accused him
of giving “general and academic” responses to MPs’ questions.
“You have been giving us very general responses, you have not impressed me,” Ijara MP Ahmed Ibrahim Abbas said.
Mr Lenku had for example explained that he was
going to apply technology in border protection but did not specify what
kind technology that will be. But he did explain that with the
additional resources he was getting from the government, he will buy
more arms and equipment for security forces.
Mr Lenku will be stepping into giant shoes: his
predecessor, Prof George Saitoti was a former Vice President for more
than decade and in the Cabinet since 1983. He had managed big dockets
such as Education and Finance and was a professor of Mathematics to
boot.
Before then was John Michuki, whose national
security experience stretched back to the colonial days when he served
in the provincial administration.
But former President Kibaki’s first National
Security minister, Dr Chris Murungaru too had no national security
experience when he was picked for the docket.
Yesterday, Mr Lenku appeared to have emerged from
the session largely unscathed with many of the committee’s members
appearing generally satisfied with his performance.
“I think he will manage. The guy was very
confident and this is a position which needs a guy who will take very
bold decisions. I am personally very confident that he is the right guy
for the job,” said a member of the committee who declined to be named
because he is on oath not to discuss the deliberations outside
Parliament.
However, Kitui Senator David Musila, a long
serving Provincial Commissioner in the Moi regime said the job required a
person with experience in security matters given the challenges facing
the country.
“One would hope that anyone who takes over this
challenge must be a man or woman with experience. It will be a pity if a
person without experience is appointed to the docket and insecurity
continues in the country,” said Mr Musila.
Budalang’i MP Ababu Namwamba also had misgivings about Mr Lenku’s ability to deliver.
“One would expect that a nominee for the Interior
Affairs docket should be a person who will immediately instill a sense
of confidence among Kenyans. While not appearing to look down upon the
gentleman, I doubt if a principal of small beverage college can deal
with this challenge,” Mr Namwamba stated.
“The government lost the opportunity in the fight
against insecurity when it sacrificed ability, experience and knowledge
at the altar of ethnic balancing. Its determination to pander to the
demands of ethnic interests clouded their eyes. I just hope that he
proves the skeptics wrong. If not, he will go down as the most
disastrous choice for a Cabinet Secretary which will come with serious
consequences,” he added.
Dr Murungaru also had some misgivings about the choice of Mr Lenku.
“I don’t know the man at all, apart from what I
have read in the press. However, handling security matters needs a bit
of political exposure. Security has a strong political component
especially the cases we are experiencing now in Tana River, Garissa,
Bungoma and other parts. It needs that approach. And because security
cuts across the country, that political touch comes into play since you
will be dealing with the totality of Kenyans. If I was asked, I would
have said he is perhaps a little bit green,” he said.
Another MP conversant with security matters but
who declined to be named also said Mr Lenku will face serious challenges
if appointed.
“He does not have a feel of the job at hand, he will need to learn very fast. It will be a baptism of fire,” said the MP.
It is the turf wars between Mr Kimaiyo and Mr
Kavuludi which, however, dominated the interview with several MPs asking
Mr Lenku what action he will take to end the squabbling.
MPs also sought to know whether the turf wars were
contributing to the rising insecurity in the country and what he would
do to fast track reforms in the police service.
Kigumo MP Jamleck Kamau fired the first salvo when
he sought to know what was causing insecurity in Western Kenya while
his Kuresoi North counterpart Moses Cheboi demanded to know who, between
Mr Kimaiyo and Mr Kavuludi, should take the blame for the problems in
the police service.
Gem MP Jakoyo Midiwo warned that the turf wars
were taking a dangerous political dimension and wondered why Mr Kimaiyo
was seeking “personal powers” yet he sat on the NPSC.
Mr Lenku explained that overlaps in the mandates
of the two offices could be behind the turf wars and said that this
could be addressed through amendments to the law establishing the two
offices.
“It appears that there could be some overlaps and I
am also privy to information that some amendments to the law are being
worked on. We will come back to you to rectify the law because we
appreciate that you can only take orders from one command,” Mr Lenku
said.
He added that he will convene a meeting to resolve
the rift between the IG and the NPSC chairman as soon as he is
appointed noting that it could be contributing to the insecurity in the
country.
“I will do this expeditiously because national security supersedes everything else, it is not about individuals,” he stated.
“I will do this expeditiously because national security supersedes everything else, it is not about individuals,” he stated.
On the conflict between the Governors and Regional
Commissioners, Mr Lenku was categorical that the law was very specific
on the roles of the two offices and warned the commissioner against
meddling in the governance of the counties.
No comments:
Post a Comment