President Uhuru Kenyatta |
President Uhuru Kenyatta has accused former Prime Minister Raila
Odinga of misleading Kenyans by misinterpreting the Constitution.
Responding
to an earlier accusation by the Cord leader, the President in an
uncharacteristic fashion, took on the former premier saying he had
allowed himself to be “misguided” by the law.
“The
statement issued earlier Saturday by the former Prime Minister Raila
Odinga shows him to be misguided about the law he purports to defend,”
said the President through his spokesman Manoah Esipisu.
In
a tough statement sent to the newsrooms Saturday evening, State House
said Mr Odinga was deeply mistaken on the impeachment of Embu Governor
Martin Wambora.
“He alleges that an injunction staying
the impeachment of the governor of Embu was unlawfully ignored by the
Senate. He is deeply mistaken,” Mr Esipisu said.
“Under
Article 95(3) of the Constitution, the Senate oversees national
revenues allocated to county governments. Under Article 125(1) the
Senate has the right to call any person to testify before it, while
Article 125(2) gives the Senate the same powers as the High Court.
Article 181(2) allows the Senate to pass legislation for the removal of a
county governor, while Parliament’s standing order no 65 specifies the
procedure,” the statement added.
Earlier, Mr Odinga
had asked the President to keep off the judiciary saying the head of
state’s support for Parliament against the Judiciary was a violation of
the rule of law. (READ: Keep hands off the courts, Raila tells Uhuru)
“Kenya
is going through a willful, premeditated, deliberate and shameless
corruption of the system of justice, with the highest ranks of the
Jubilee government supporting this assault on law and order,” Mr Odinga
said in a statement sent to newsrooms Saturday morning. (READ: Uhuru backs MPs in row with Judiciary)
The
President’s spokesman however disputed the opposition leader’s
statement saying he should have presented evidence to show that the
President was cushioning parliament from the judiciary.
“The
former Prime Minister’s statement presents no other evidence for its
claims. Instead of disquieting the public with false claims about the
law, we invite him to join the bipartisan consensus in support of the
Senate’s action. Members of his party, and members of the ruling Jubilee
coalition, are in full agreement that the Senate properly exercised its
constitutional mandate to oversee county expenditure of Kenyan
taxpayers’ hard-earned money,” Mr Esipisu said.
The spokesman defended the Senate saying the House acted as per the Constitution.
“Mr
Wambora was called to the Senate regarding the management of revenue in
his county. In calling him, the Senate had the same power as the High
Court to take evidence, and require the appearance of witnesses. In
impeaching him, the Senate acted according to Article 181 of the
constitution, and Standing order 65. No order issued by a lower court
can prevent the Senate from carrying out its constitutional duty,” he
said.
No comments:
Post a Comment