A dream doesn't become reality through magic. It takes sweat, determination and hard work.

Thursday, 11 December 2014

One in 5 children think Jesus plays for Chelsea and the shepherds found the stable with Google maps

A survey by Netmums also found only one in three schools are staging a traditional nativity, with many putting on a modern show

Not a Chelsea player: One in five kids think Jesus plays for the club

The meaning of Christmas is increasingly lost on kids – with one in five believing Jesus plays for Chelsea.

And a quarter of tech-mad, modern kids think the shepherds found the infant Jesus in his manger thanks to Google maps, according to a survey.

One in four also think the Virgin Birth took place in a church and one in 10 believe Rudolph the Reindeer was there, says the study of five to 12-year-olds.

And more than half believe Christmas Day marks Santa Claus’s birthday, which is why they get presents.

Santa Claus carrying sack of presents
Was he there: Santa Claus carrying sack of presents 
 A total of 1,000 children were asked the multiple choice questions by London shopping centre Brent Cross, including: Who is Jesus Christ? a) A footballer for Chelsea b) Son of God c) TV presenter d) X Factor contestant or e) An astronaut. Amazingly, 20% picked a).

And more than one in 10 reckon the Three Kings brought gifts of a wand, tiara and wings to celebrate his birth.

The shock result comes after online parenting group Netmums found only one in three schools are staging a traditional nativity play this month.

Uhuru pays hospital bill for Wajir terror attack victim

News December 11, 2014

By Wangari Njuguna @PeopleDailyKe

It was joy and jubilation at Mamumbu village Murang’a East sub-county when one family re-united with a relative who survived a terror attack in Wajir two weeks ago.

Rowland Kang’ethe, a businessman in Wajir town, was attacked by unknown people as he walked home on November 19 and shot four times and left for the dead.

He sustained serious injuries and was later transferred to Kenyatta National Hospital where he was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for two weeks.

However, after recovering from the gunshot wounds and discharged, the father of five was detained at the hospital after he failed to clear his medical bill of Sh115,000.

He slept on the floor at the hospital for lack of means to settle the bill. His plight, however, attracted the attention of President Uhuru Kenyatta after the story was aired on Kameme FM and the President e offered to clear his bill.

Kang’ethe said the gunman also shot dead one of his friends who ran a pharmacy shop in Wajir. He said the shooting has left him with serious injuries that could affect his ability to operate his business. Kang’ethe says he is afraid of going back to Wajir in case a similar incident befalls him.

“I am afraid to go back to Wajir because I don’t know the intention of the people who shot me and killed my friend or even who they were,” he said.

Bensouda wants to appeal ICC decision not to refer Kenya for non-cooperation

Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has written to the ICC judges seeking permission to appeal their 3 December 2014 ruling not to refer the government of Kenya to the Assembly of States Parties (the ASP is the ICC's governing body) for non-compliance.

By The Hague Trials Kenya

In her filing, Bensouda notes that the judges themselves indicated in their ruling that the government’s relationship with the ICC “falls short of the standard of good faith cooperation” as it pertains to the case against President Kenyatta.

She quotes the judges who said that:

“The Kenyan government's non-compliance has not only compromised the Prosecution's ability to thoroughly investigate the charges, but has ultimately impinged upon the Chamber's ability to fulfil its mandate.”

Bensouda’s written request questions why, despite the findings above, the Chamber ruled that the prosecution had failed to justify its submission that Kenya should be referred to the ASP.

If the judges grant leave (permission) to appeal the decision, Bensouda intends to appeal their decision on non-cooperation based on two main grounds:

  1. To find out whether the Chamber’s findings on the government of Kenya’s cooperation were formal or informal;
  2. To find out whether the Chamber exercised discretion in its decision not refer the government of Kenya to the ASP and subsequently, whether they ‘erred’ in the exercise of that discretion.

In total, the Prosecution has made two attempts to have Kenya referred to the ASP for non-cooperation. The first time was on 29 November 2013.

After this application, a status conference was convened on 13 February 2014, during which the judges adjourned Kenyatta’s trial date to 7 October 2014 to give the prosecution and the government more time to resolve the cooperation issues.

Later, when the prosecution revealed that it was not prepared to proceed to trial on 7 October, the judges scheduled another status conference on the same day to discuss the status of cooperation between the prosecution and the Kenyan government.

It was at this status conference that the prosecution indicated that it still wanted to refer the government of Kenya to the ASP for non-cooperation, indicating that the consultations had reached a deadlock. And subsequently, the judges rejected the prosecution's application.

Although the ASP is comprised of countries which have signed up to the ICC’s founding treaty – The Rome Statute - Dov Jacobs, assistant professor of law at Leiden University, suggests that a referral of a member state for non-cooperation may only result in “a slap on the wrist” since “there aren’t any coercive sanctions possible.”

It now remains to be seen whether the judges will allow the prosecution to take the issue before the ICC’s Appeal’s Chamber.

Lead image: ICC Chief Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda (Photo: ICC-CPI/Flickr)


How aggressive Nairobi prostitutes rob men

k24

Nairobi prostitutes have been robbing men in uncanny ways. The hookers approach the men in the city streets and offer their services. If the man declines or seems uninterested, they throw themselves all over the victim in a desperate bid to lure him in. At the same time though, they are robbing the victim of his possessions. The hotspot is around Luthuli Avenue and River Road. Watch video courtesy of K24TV

Wednesday, 10 December 2014

Bulungula Incubator - African-style innovation to combat deep poverty

Leading South African economist ensures that freedoms won through anti-apartheid are protected through new model. 
featuring a story of a leading South African economist who is ensuring that the freedoms so hard won in the anti-apartheid movement are protected by addressing economic inequality with a whole new model for rural development in Mandela’s homeland.
 
The gist of the film is this: 
 
Bulungula Incubator - African-style innovation to combat deep poverty
 
Technology incubators in tech centers like Silicon Valley have created some spectacular results, generating billions of dollars in revenue through the launch of businesses, creating jobs and fostering the entrepreneurial climate in their communities.  However, this model of incubation has not been applied in the same way to address deep poverty and to support community development.
 
Réjane Woodroffe, who grew up as a ‘colored’ girl during apartheid and later became a senior economist, set out to change this in one of the poorest corners of Mandela’s homeland.  She is the 2014 recipient of the of the seventh annual John P. McNulty Prize.  
 
"Poverty is something much deeper than just not having material resources. It’s about not having the ability, the confidence and the agency to make a plan and change your life into something you'd want it to be for yourself and your family," she said.
 
Réjane founded the Bulungula Incubator in 2007 with the understanding that addressing poverty in a community has no one solution, but requires a comprehensive strategy and ownership by the community members.  “By finding a way to enact lasting change in this region, the Bulungula Incubator is a beacon for rural communities struggling with similar issues. Most importantly, these communities have ownership over the improvements they make, creating a virtuous cycle of civic involvement and improvement of quality of life,” said former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, a member of the McNulty Prize jury.
 

We thought that this particular story might be something you would be interested in sharing. Please let me know if you would like to learn more.
 
 
 
Best,
 
Elizabeth Kabacinski
Micro-Documentaries

The CIA’s Secret Sites in Somalia (Special Report)

338-0713081936-torture-cell

Nestled in a back corner of Mogadishu’s Aden Adde International Airport is a sprawling walled compound run by the Central Intelligence Agency. Set on the coast of the Indian Ocean, the facility looks like a small gated community, with more than a dozen buildings behind large protective walls and secured by guard towers at each of its four corners. Adjacent to the compound are eight large metal hangars, and the CIA has its own aircraft at the airport. The site, which airport officials and Somali intelligence sources say was completed four months ago, is guarded by Somali soldiers, but the Americans control access. At the facility, the CIA runs a counterterrorism training program for Somali intelligence agents and operatives aimed at building an indigenous strike force capable of snatch operations and targeted “combat” operations against members of Al Shabab, an Islamic militant group with close ties to Al Qaeda.
As part of its expanding counterterrorism program in Somalia, the CIA also uses a secret prison buried in the basement of Somalia’s National Security Agency (NSA) headquarters, where prisoners suspected of being Shabab members or of having links to the group are held. Some of the prisoners have been snatched off the streets of Kenya and rendered by plane to Mogadishu. While the underground prison is officially run by the Somali NSA, US intelligence personnel pay the salaries of intelligence agents and also directly interrogate prisoners. The existence of both facilities and the CIA role was uncovered by The Nation during an extensive on-the-ground investigation in Mogadishu. Among the sources who provided information for this story are senior Somali intelligence officials; senior members of Somalia’s Transitional Federal Government (TFG); former prisoners held at the underground prison; and several well-connected Somali analysts and militia leaders, some of whom have worked with US agents, including those from the CIA. A US official, who confirmed the existence of both sites, told The Nation, “It makes complete sense to have a strong counterterrorism partnership” with the Somali government.

The CIA presence in Mogadishu is part of Washington’s intensifying counterterrorism focus on Somalia, which includes targeted strikes by US Special Operations forces, drone attacks and expanded surveillance operations. The US agents “are here full time,” a senior Somali intelligence official told me. At times, he said, there are as many as thirty of them in Mogadishu, but he stressed that those working with the Somali NSA do not conduct operations; rather, they advise and train Somali agents. “In this environment, it’s very tricky. They want to help us, but the situation is not allowing them to do [it] however they want. They are not in control of the politics, they are not in control of the security,” he adds. “They are not controlling the environment like Afghanistan and Iraq. In Somalia, the situation is fluid, the situation is changing, personalities changing.”

According to well-connected Somali sources, the CIA is reluctant to deal directly with Somali political leaders, who are regarded by US officials as corrupt and untrustworthy. Instead, the United States has Somali intelligence agents on its payroll. Somali sources with knowledge of the program described the agents as lining up to receive $200 monthly cash payments from Americans. “They support us in a big way financially,” says the senior Somali intelligence official. “They are the largest [funder] by far.”

According to former detainees, the underground prison, which is staffed by Somali guards, consists of a long corridor lined with filthy small cells infested with bedbugs and mosquitoes. One said that when he arrived in February, he saw two white men wearing military boots, combat trousers, gray tucked-in shirts and black sunglasses. The former prisoners described the cells as windowless and the air thick, moist and disgusting. Prisoners, they said, are not allowed outside. Many have developed rashes and scratch themselves incessantly. Some have been detained for a year or more. According to one former prisoner, inmates who had been there for long periods would pace around constantly, while others leaned against walls rocking.

A Somali who was arrested in Mogadishu and taken to the prison told The Nation that he was held in a windowless underground cell. Among the prisoners he met during his time there was a man who held a Western passport (he declined to identify the man’s nationality). Some of the prisoners told him they were picked up in Nairobi and rendered on small aircraft to Mogadishu, where they were handed over to Somali intelligence agents. Once in custody, according to the senior Somali intelligence official and former prisoners, some detainees are freely interrogated by US and French agents. “Our goal is to please our partners, so we get more [out] of them, like any relationship,” said the Somali intelligence official in describing the policy of allowing foreign agents, including from the CIA, to interrogate prisoners. The Americans, according to the Somali official, operate unilaterally in the country, while the French agents are embedded within the African Union force known as AMISOM.

Among the men believed to be held in the secret underground prison is Ahmed Abdullahi Hassan, a 25- or 26-year-old Kenyan citizen who disappeared from the congested Somali slum of Eastleigh in Nairobi around July 2009. After he went missing, Hassan’s family retained Mbugua Mureithi, a well-known Kenyan human rights lawyer, who filed a habeas petition on his behalf. The Kenyan government responded that Hassan was not being held in Kenya and said it had no knowledge of his whereabouts. His fate remained a mystery until this spring, when another man who had been held in the Mogadishu prison contacted Clara Gutteridge, a veteran human rights investigator with the British legal organization Reprieve, and told her he had met Hassan in the prison. Hassan, he said, had told him how Kenyan police had knocked down his door, snatched him and taken him to a secret location in Nairobi. The next night, Hassan had said, he was rendered to Mogadishu.

According to the former fellow prisoner, Hassan told him that his captors took him to Wilson Airport: “‘They put a bag on my head, Guantánamo style. They tied my hands behind my back and put me on a plane. In the early hours we landed in Mogadishu. The way I realized I was in Mogadishu was because of the smell of the sea—the runway is just next to the seashore. The plane lands and touches the sea. They took me to this prison, where I have been up to now. I have been here for one year, seven months. I have been interrogated so many times. Interrogated by Somali men and white men. Every day. New faces show up. They have nothing on me. I have never seen a lawyer, never seen an outsider. Only other prisoners, interrogators, guards. Here there is no court or tribunal.’”

After meeting the man who had spoken with Hassan in the underground prison, Gutteridge began working with Hassan’s Kenyan lawyers to determine his whereabouts. She says he has never been charged or brought before a court. “Hassan’s abduction from Nairobi and rendition to a secret prison in Somalia bears all the hallmarks of a classic US rendition operation,” she says. The US official interviewed for this article denied the CIA had rendered Hassan but said, “The United States provided information which helped get Hassan—a dangerous terrorist—off the street.” Human Rights Watch and Reprieve have documented that Kenyan security and intelligence forces have facilitated scores of renditions for the US and other governments, including eighty-five people rendered to Somalia in 2007 alone. Gutteridge says the director of the Mogadishu prison told one of her sources that Hassan had been targeted in Nairobi because of intelligence suggesting he was the “right-hand man” of Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan, at the time a leader of Al Qaeda in East Africa. Nabhan, a Kenyan citizen of Yemeni descent, was among the top suspects sought for questioning by US authorities over his alleged role in the coordinated 2002 attacks on a tourist hotel and an Israeli aircraft in Mombasa, Kenya, and possible links to the 1998 US Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.

An intelligence report leaked by the Kenyan Anti-Terrorist Police Unit in October 2010 alleged that Hassan, a “former personal assistant to Nabhan…was injured while fighting near the presidential palace in Mogadishu in 2009.” The authenticity of the report cannot be independently confirmed, though Hassan did have a leg amputated below the knee, according to his former fellow prisoner in Mogadishu.

Two months after Hassan was allegedly rendered to the secret Mogadishu prison, Nabhan, the man believed to be his Al Qaeda boss, was killed in the first known targeted killing operation in Somalia authorized by President Obama. On September 14, 2009, a team from the elite US counterterrorism force, the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), took off by helicopters from a US Navy ship off Somalia’s coast and penetrated Somali airspace. In broad daylight, in an operation code-named Celestial Balance, they gunned down Nabhan’s convoy from the air. JSOC troops then landed and collected at least two of the bodies, including Nabhan’s.

Hassan’s lawyers are preparing to file a habeas petition on his behalf in US courts. “Hassan’s case suggests that the US may be involved in a decentralized, out-sourced Guantánamo Bay in central Mogadishu,” his legal team asserted in a statement to The Nation. “Mr. Hassan must be given the opportunity to challenge both his rendition and continued detention as a matter of urgency. The US must urgently confirm exactly what has been done to Mr. Hassan, why he is being held, and when he will be given a fair hearing.”

Gutteridge, who has worked extensively tracking the disappearances of terror suspects in Kenya, was deported from Kenya on May 11.
The underground prison where Hassan is allegedly being held is housed in the same building once occupied by Somalia’s infamous National Security Service (NSS) during the military regime of Siad Barre, who ruled from 1969 to 1991. The former prisoner who met Hassan there said he saw an old NSS sign outside. During Barre’s regime, the notorious basement prison and interrogation center, which sits behind the presidential palace in Mogadishu, was a staple of the state’s apparatus of repression. It was referred to as Godka, “The Hole.”

“The bunker is there, and that’s where the intelligence agency does interrogate people,” says Abdirahman “Aynte” Ali, a Somali analyst who has researched the Shabab and Somali security forces. “When CIA and other intelligence agencies—who actually are in Mogadishu—want to interrogate those people, they usually just do that.” Somali officials “start the interrogation, but then foreign intelligence agencies eventually do their own interrogation as well, the Americans and the French.” The US official said that US agents’ “debriefing” prisoners in the facility has “been done on only rare occasions” and always jointly with Somali agents.

Some prisoners, like Hassan, were allegedly rendered from Nairobi, while in other cases, according to Aynte, “the US and other intelligence agencies have notified the Somali intelligence agency that some people, some suspects, people who have been in contact with the leadership of Al Shabab, are on their way to Mogadishu on a [commercial] plane, and to essentially be at the airport for those people. Catch them, interrogate them.”

* * *

In the eighteen years since the infamous “Black Hawk Down” incident in Mogadishu, US policy on Somalia has been marked by neglect, miscalculation and failed attempts to use warlords to build indigenous counterterrorism capacity, many of which have backfired dramatically. At times, largely because of abuses committed by Somali militias the CIA has supported, US policy has strengthened the hand of the very groups it purports to oppose and inadvertently aided the rise of militant groups, including the Shabab. Many Somalis viewed the Islamic movement known as the Islamic Courts Union, which defeated the CIA’s warlords in Mogadishu in 2006, as a stabilizing, albeit ruthless, force. The ICU was dismantled in a US-backed Ethiopian invasion in 2007. Over the years, a series of weak Somali administrations have been recognized by the United States and other powers as Somalia’s legitimate government. Ironically, its current president is a former leader of the ICU.

Today, Somali government forces control roughly thirty square miles of territory in Mogadishu thanks in large part to the US-funded and -armed 9,000-member AMISOM force. Much of the rest of the city is under the control of the Shabab or warlords. Outgunned, the Shabab has increasingly relied on the linchpins of asymmetric warfare—suicide bombings, roadside bombs and targeted assassinations. The militant group has repeatedly shown that it can strike deep in the heart of its enemies’ territory. On June 9, in one of its most spectacular suicide attacks to date, the Shabab assassinated the Somali government’s minister of interior affairs and national security, Abdishakur Sheikh Hassan Farah, who was attacked in his residence by his niece. The girl, whom the minister was putting through university, blew herself up and fatally wounded her uncle. He died hours later in the hospital. Farah was the fifth Somali minister killed by the Shabab in the past two years and the seventeenth official assassinated since 2006. Among the suicide bombers the Shabab has deployed were at least three US citizens of Somali descent; at least seven other Americans have died fighting alongside the Shabab, a fact that has not gone unnoticed in Washington or Mogadishu.

During his confirmation hearings in June to become the head of the US Special Operations Command, Vice Admiral William McRaven said, “From my standpoint as a former JSOC commander, I can tell you we were looking very hard” at Somalia. McRaven said that in order to expand successful “kinetic strikes” there, the United States will have to increase its use of drones as well as on-the-ground intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance operations. “Any expansion of manpower is going to have to come with a commensurate expansion of the enablers,” McRaven declared. The expanding US counterterrorism program in Mogadishu appears to be part of that effort.

In an interview with The Nation in Mogadishu, Abdulkadir Moallin Noor, the minister of state for the presidency, confirmed that US agents “are working with our intelligence” and “giving them training.” Regarding the US counterterrorism effort, Noor said bluntly, “We need more; otherwise, the terrorists will take over the country.”

It is unclear how much control, if any, Somalia’s internationally recognized president, Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, has over this counterterrorism force or if he is even fully briefed on its operations. The CIA personnel and other US intelligence agents “do not bother to be in touch with the political leadership of the country. And that says a lot about the intentions,” says Aynte. “Essentially, the CIA seems to be operating, doing the foreign policy of the United States. You should have had State Department people doing foreign policy, but the CIA seems to be doing it across the country.”

While the Somali officials interviewed for this story said the CIA is the lead US agency on the Mogadishu counterterrorism program, they also indicated that US military intelligence agents are at times involved. When asked if they are from JSOC or the Defense Intelligence Agency, the senior Somali intelligence official responded, “We don’t know. They don’t tell us.”

In April Ahmed Abdulkadir Warsame, a Somali man the United States alleged had links to the Shabab, was captured by JSOC forces in the Gulf of Aden. He was held incommunicado on a US Navy vessel for more than two months; in July he was transferred to New York and indicted on terrorism charges. Warsame’s case ignited a legal debate over the Obama administration’s policies on capturing and detaining terror suspects, particularly in light of the widening counterterrorism campaigns in Somalia and Yemen.

On June 23 the United States reportedly carried out a drone strike against alleged Shabab members near Kismayo, 300 miles from the Somali capital. As with the Nabhan operation, a JSOC team swooped in on helicopters and reportedly snatched the bodies of those killed and wounded. The men were taken to an undisclosed location. On July 6 three more US strikes reportedly targeted Shabab training camps in the same area. Somali analysts warned that if the US bombings cause civilian deaths, as they have in the past, they could increase support for the Shabab. Asked in an interview with The Nation in Mogadishu if US drone strikes strengthen or weaken his government, President Sharif replied, “Both at the same time. For our sovereignty, it’s not good to attack a sovereign country. That’s the negative part. The positive part is you’re targeting individuals who are criminals.”

A week after the June 23 strike, President Obama’s chief counterterrorism adviser, John Brennan, described an emerging US strategy that would focus not on “deploying large armies abroad but delivering targeted, surgical pressure to the groups that threaten us.” Brennan singled out the Shabab, saying, “From the territory it controls in Somalia, Al Shabab continues to call for strikes against the United States,” adding, “We cannot and we will not let down our guard. We will continue to pummel Al Qaeda and its ilk.”

While the United States appears to be ratcheting up both its rhetoric and its drone strikes against the Shabab, it has thus far been able to strike only in rural areas outside Mogadishu. These operations have been isolated and infrequent, and Somali analysts say they have failed to disrupt the Shabab’s core leadership, particularly in Mogadishu.

In a series of interviews in Mogadishu, several of the country’s recognized leaders, including President Sharif, called on the US government to quickly and dramatically increase its assistance to the Somali military in the form of training, equipment and weapons. Moreover, they argue that without viable civilian institutions, Somalia will remain ripe for terrorist groups that can further destabilize not only Somalia but the region. “I believe that the US should help the Somalis to establish a government that protects civilians and its people,” Sharif said.
In the battle against the Shabab, the United States does not, in fact, appear to have cast its lot with the Somali government. The emerging US strategy on Somalia—borne out in stated policy, expanded covert presence and funding plans—is two-pronged: On the one hand, the CIA is training, paying and at times directing Somali intelligence agents who are not firmly under the control of the Somali government, while JSOC conducts unilateral strikes without the prior knowledge of the government; on the other, the Pentagon is increasing its support for and arming of the counterterrorism operations of non-Somali African military forces.

A draft of a defense spending bill approved in late June by the Senate Armed Services Committee would authorize more than $75 million in US counterterrorism assistance aimed at fighting the Shabab and Al Qaeda in Somalia. The bill, however, did not authorize additional funding for Somalia’s military, as the country’s leaders have repeatedly asked. Instead, the aid package would dramatically increase US arming and financing of AMISOM’s forces, particularly from Uganda and Burundi, as well as the militaries of Djibouti, Kenya and Ethiopia. The Somali military, the committee asserted, is unable to “exercise control of its territory.”

That makes it all the more ironic that perhaps the greatest tactical victory won in recent years in Somalia was delivered not by AMISOM, the CIA or JSOC but by members of a Somali militia fighting as part of the government’s chaotic local military. And it was a pure accident.

Late in the evening on June 7, a man whose South African passport identified him as Daniel Robinson was in the passenger seat of a Toyota SUV driving on the outskirts of Mogadishu when his driver, a Kenyan national, missed a turn and headed straight toward a checkpoint manned by Somali forces. A firefight broke out, and the two men inside the car were killed. The Somali forces promptly looted the laptops, cellphones, documents, weapons and $40,000 in cash they found in the car, according to the senior Somali intelligence official.

Upon discovering that the men were foreigners, the Somali NSA launched an investigation and recovered the items that had been looted. “There was a lot of English and Arabic stuff, papers,” recalls the Somali intelligence official, containing “very tactical stuff” that appeared to be linked to Al Qaeda, including “two senior people communicating.” The Somali agents “realized it was an important man” and informed the CIA in Mogadishu. The men’s bodies were taken to the NSA. The Americans took DNA samples and fingerprints and flew them to Nairobi for processing.

Within hours, the United States confirmed that Robinson was in fact Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, a top leader of Al Qaeda in East Africa and its chief liaison with the Shabab. Fazul, a twenty-year veteran of Al Qaeda, had been indicted by the United States for his alleged role in the 1998 US Embassy bombings and was on the FBI’s “Most Wanted Terrorists” list. A JSOC attempt to kill him in a January 2007 airstrike resulted in the deaths of at least seventy nomads in rural Somalia, and he had been underground ever since. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Fazul’s death “a significant blow to Al Qaeda, its extremist allies and its operations in East Africa. It is a just end for a terrorist who brought so much death and pain to so many innocents.”

At its facilities in Mogadishu, the CIA and its Somali NSA agents continue to pore over the materials recovered from Fazul’s car, which served as a mobile headquarters. Some deleted and encrypted files were recovered and decoded by US agents. The senior Somali intelligence official said that the intelligence may prove more valuable on a tactical level than the cache found in Osama bin Laden’s house in Pakistan, especially in light of the increasing US focus on East Africa. The Americans, he said, were “unbelievably grateful”; he hopes it means they will take Somalia’s forces more seriously and provide more support.

But the United States continues to wage its campaign against the Shabab primarily by funding the AMISOM forces, which are not conducting their mission with anything resembling surgical precision. Instead, over the past several months the AMISOM forces in Mogadishu have waged a merciless campaign of indiscriminate shelling of Shabab areas, some of which are heavily populated by civilians. While AMISOM regularly puts out press releases boasting of gains against the Shabab and the retaking of territory, the reality paints a far more complicated picture.

Throughout the areas AMISOM has retaken is a honeycomb of underground tunnels once used by Shabab fighters to move from building to building. By some accounts, the tunnels stretch continuously for miles. Leftover food, blankets and ammo cartridges lay scattered near “pop-up” positions once used by Shabab snipers and guarded by sandbags—all that remain of guerrilla warfare positions. Not only have the Shabab fighters been cleared from the aboveground areas; the civilians that once resided there have been cleared too. On several occasions in late June, AMISOM forces fired artillery from their airport base at the Bakaara market, where whole neighborhoods are totally abandoned. Houses lie in ruins and animals wander aimlessly, chewing trash. In some areas, bodies have been hastily buried in trenches with dirt barely masking the remains. On the side of the road in one former Shabab neighborhood, a decapitated corpse lay just meters from a new government checkpoint.

In late June the Pentagon approved plans to send $45 million worth of military equipment to Uganda and Burundi, the two major forces in the AMISOM operation. Among the new items are four small Raven surveillance drones, night-vision and communications equipment and other surveillance gear, all of which augur a more targeted campaign. Combined with the attempt to build an indigenous counterterrorism force at the Somali NSA, a new US counterterrorism strategy is emerging.

But according to the senior Somali intelligence official, who works directly with the US agents, the CIA-led program in Mogadishu has brought few tangible gains. “So far what we have not seen is the results in terms of the capacity of the [Somali] agency,” says the official. He conceded that neither US nor Somali forces have been able to conduct a single successful targeted mission in the Shabab’s areas in the capital. In late 2010, according to the official, US-trained Somali agents conducted an operation in a Shabab area that failed terribly and resulted in several of them being killed. “There was an attempt, but it was a haphazard one,” he recalls. They have not tried another targeted operation in Shabab-controlled territory since.

Source: The Nation

Uhuru's decision left CORD flat-footed, again

The word ‘flat-footed’ originates from a disease called
 Pes planus or fallen arch, which flattens the arch of the foot and causes an imbalance of forces important to the biomechanics of motion and balance of weight on the human foot during motion. This term is also widely used in sports.

In football, when a player is caught flat-footed, s/he is unable to stretch out to reach for the freely moving ball or when dribbled by an opponent. In the flatfoot position, a player is not ready to tackle an opponent or receive a pass. It may be due to loss of concentration, poor posture or deliberate plot by the opponent to challenge one. At all times, a player is expected to be on toes and move about to avoid being caught in this position hard to recover from in time to make a save or dispossess an opponent of the ball. Enough of football.

Politics

In politics in democracies the world over, an election leaves two groups of people: losers and winners. The winners obviously rejoice while the losers whine about internal malfunctions or a plot by the winners to make them lose. Our Kenyan election cycle is not spared of this.

2013 Elections

After the historic 2013 General elections, the first of its kind under the guidance of the iconic new constitution, The Jubilee coalition emerged the winners, though not without court battles. The CORD coalition accepted their fate in the opposition, though half-heartedly. They have incessantly complained publicly about how their victory was stolen. They have mentioned how two communities could not have the numbers to beat the other 40.

The result

However, this has only served to create animosity between the ruling coalition and the opposition. It has even trickled down to important national matters of security and citizen service delivery. As they say, no one would sit to see food bolus taken out of one’s mouth before swallowing. The Jubilee coalition has proved to be having the hardest job of surmounting an opposition so quick to prey on its failures and wrong decisions to popularize itself to the electorate, and presenting itself as the best alternative government Kenyans never elected. Well, the wit of a man (no pun intended) is seen at times of crisis.

Crisis time

The Jubilee coalition has found itself in narrow defiles that require the strongest will to survive. When the Westgate terror attack knocked, it would be the first crisis to a budding government just learning the ropes. Even though there were outright failures in response and chain of command on parts of authorities, the government could find refuge in its then greenness. At normal times, sackings and prosecutions would have ensued, but Uhuru calmed down and asked Kenyans to be patient. Well, it was until recently that the memories were ignited amidst high emotions and grief as relatives to the deceased remembered their departed in the first anniversary. No arrests have been made so far and the Parliamentary report has not been either published or made public.

Such open failures have been the best opportunities for the watchful opposition to point to fissures in the government.

Public appointments

Then came the time for President Uhuru to make crucial ministerial appointments. As expected, ethnic and gender imbalance were a glaring misdeed, but the government hid under the garb of professionalism. This it maintained, despite flouting its earlier resolve to reflect the diversity of Kenya in public appointments. Then came the last two appointments which speculations had that some of his post-election coalition partners Mudavadi and Wamalwa could have been beneficiaries. This didn’t happen, but still he again flaunted his declaration to exclude any former politicians. The opposition attacked when Ngilu and Balala made it to the cabinet.

In the recent ambassadorial appointments done by the President, some opposition MP’s claimed that it was an ethnic zero-sum game, since it involved replacing someone with another of own ethnicity. Despite having the Parliament as a platform to raise these issues, they kept silent as the names were passed by parliament.

All through these, the opposition gained popularity with every mistake of the government. It was not until the presidency convened a meeting with his MPs that a strategy was reached to counter the surging opposition amidst claims that the ruling coalition was losing grassroot support.

Mpeketoni Massacre

At the peak of heightened political activity by the opposition, disaster struck the coastal town of Lamu vicinity. At the time, CORD had taken its campaign-to force the government to convene a structured dialogue with politicians and community leaders-to Lamu. The same night unknown attackers used Guns and pangas to kill tens of people in one night. This would be repeated in two more nights.

Blame games

The opposition was satisfied that it was the act of al Shabaab militia. But not so with government intelligence who blamed ‘local political networks’ involvement. CS Lenku went ahead to blatantly blame the opposition mercenaries on the deaths. Then it was clear that a war had been waged between the CORD coalition and Government. The opposition was forced to stop its campaigns in good will to resolve the crisis. To date, no serious prosecutions have been done and the opposition leaders are roaming free. Was it true?

 CORD’s flatfoot

To an opposition that has in many instances relied on government mistakes to further its agenda, it can be very confusing to find out that the latter no longer makes any mistakes.

In the run-up to last year’s General elections, CORD did not do more than mentioning the Jubilee leaders’ cases at the ICC over the 2007 post-election violence as the only reason they were better placed to lead the country. Despite their jubilee-old political experience, they could not offer better promises as their rivals. When it came to the moment President Kenyatta was summoned to appear before the Hague-based court, they expected to leverage on any wrong decisions to popularize themselves one again.

CORD’s advice

Most CORD MP’s advised the President not to honor the summon arguing that he did not have to, after all. This was outright misadvise and dishonesty with ulterior motives. CORD knows well what would have befallen Uhuru should he have failed to honor the summon, vis-à-vis the shocker of honoring. The fact that CORD openly misguided the President on a case of international magnitude is a matter of morality, and this surpasses fair political gaming. In fact, it is huge disrespect to the institution of Presidency which CORD leadership has been longing for for decades. Perhaps the missing piece of advice for CORD is that one cannot occupy a seat one disrespects.

When their expectation failed to materialize, CORD resorted to childish legal hullabaloos about President’s special  parliamentary address on Monday, claiming it was unnecessary.

CORD’s perennial failure

Even though CORD as a coalition is young, its leaders have been in the political scene for long. What they have failed in doing is to offer better alternatives and engage the public in a manner appreciable to the electorate. One cannot be good because the other is bad. When one mentions a referendum in which the government must participate to pass, then Kenyans are being taken for a ride. It is not the best contribution the Opposition can make to Kenyans. There are myriad policy issues that need be debated and passed. There are tax policy loopholes that need be filled to ensure that multination companies remit required taxes to the Treasury, thereby lessening the tax burden on Kenyans. If CORD cannot pursue these, then even the plebiscite move is a waste of time.

Finally, if CORD’s political game would be leveraging on Government failures to popularize itself, then it will always be caught flat foot. The unavoidable result would be disastrous to the coalition and its members. The government has realized their game, and will first plot its downfall by doing things right. Then CORD will diminish. Oops!

Kenya’s threat to bring charges against those involved in the making of “Inside Kenya’s Death Squads”, broadcast on December 8.

December 10, 2014
Response to statement by Government of Kenya

Al Jazeera Media Network is deeply concerned by the Government of Kenya’s threat to bring charges against those involved in the making of “Inside Kenya’s Death Squads”, broadcast on December 8.

Al Jazeera urges the Government of Kenya (GoK) not to attack journalists or to curtail freedom of speech, but instead to confront the serious allegations that its agents commit extra-judicial killings.

“Inside Kenya’s Death Squads”, produced by the network’s Investigative Unit, features the testimony of a number of members of Kenya’s counter terrorism units. Each states that the police assassinate suspects on government orders. They claim orders come from the National Security Council, a body chaired by President Uhuru Kenyatta.

The documentary was neither “malicious” nor “unethical”. Each point made by the GoK is erroneous and misinformed.

• The promotional material for the documentary never claimed death squads had killed 500 clerics.

• The programme gave the GoK ample opportunity to reply to the accusations and included its denials.

• The identities of all persons interviewed and documents released were checked and verified.

The investigation was the confirmation of an allegation that has been widespread in Kenya for many years:

• The International Criminal Court has spent more than four years examining evidence of extra-judicial killings said to have been committed by the President and his deputy. The case collapsed after the Prosecutor accused the GoK of “an unprecedented effort to intimidate and interfere with witnesses”.

• In 2009, Wikileaks published a document that provided evidence that over 500 young men were killed or made to disappear in a police campaign.

• The United Nations special rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, Philip Alston, declared in 2010: “I have received overwhelming testimony that there exists in Kenya a systematic, widespread and well-planned strategy to execute individuals.”

• In August 2014, Human Rights Watch issued a report that concluded: “There is strong evidence that Kenya’s Anti-Terrorism Police Unit (ATPU) has carried out a series of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances.”

• Former Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga said on December 9 in response to our investigation: “I have been in the National Security Council and I am aware that the government has a hit squad.”

The GoK accuses those involved in the production of violating “the democratic space which every Kenyan must protect to prevent our democracy from being appropriated by agents and/ or sympathizers of extremists and terrorist agenda.”

Al Jazeera rejects this claim.

While the team that conducted the investigation is based outside Kenya, the statement appears directed at journalists within the country who examine and report on government abuses.

We note that the GoK is proposing new legislation seeking to punish journalists who are found guilty of “undermining security operations”. According to reports, the Security Laws (Amendment) Bill 2014 seeks to jail such persons for up to three years or fine them five million Kenyan Shilling (55,000 USD) or both.

Al Jazeera defends the right of journalists to freedom of expression and condemns attempts to restrict the work of professional journalism. It stands by colleagues in the profession facing acts of aggression and harassment.

Tags: Kenya KenyaKillings AJAfrica Investigations

America's fugitive family who have lived cut off from the outside world for 15 years

Family of fugitives who have spent the last 14 years living in isolation on a 47-acre compound since his granddad, John Joe, skipped bail and threatened to kill any law-enforcement officer who dared step onto his land

Reaching into the cage, 16-year-old Bubba Gale grabs a pet chicken. But he has no intention of playing with it. Grinning, he lays it on to a tree stump and deftly chops off the animal’s head with his axe.

“This is how we survive,” says Bubba’s dad Jonathan with a shrug as his son throws the headless, flapping body into a cage and gives its head to the pet dogs.

“The children were raised up killing animals to eat. They can pet it one minute, and can cut its head off the next.

“This is the way our forefathers used to do things. They couldn’t run to the store and get no chicken.”

And neither can Bubba. Because he’s part of a family of fugitives who have spent the last 14 years living in isolation on a 47-acre compound since his granddad, John Joe, skipped bail and threatened to kill any law-enforcement officer who dared step onto his land.

John Joe Gray 
 

Their armed compound in the aptly-named city of Gun Barrel, Texas, is truly a throwback to simpler times.

There is no electricity or running water and everything they eat is grown or reared on their land.

No refrigeration means surplus food has to be preserved. Bubba’s chicken is quickly salted and stored in glass jars so it will last for months.

Everyone but the youngest grandchild carries a gun at all times. The leather holsters are incongruous against their grubby home-made clothes but patriarch John Joe, 66, takes great pleasure in how his family has been raised.

For more than 11 years, John Joe Gray and his country clan have been holed up inside their own private prison 

“God prepared us for it,” he says of the family’s lifestyle. “We look at this place like its our ark. The grandchildren all learn how to survive too.”

His son Jonathan adds: “We never done without. We always had food. Course, it wasn’t what we liked but then, we couldn’t run up to Dairy Queen and get our burger and fries.”

Their lives may be straightforward now, but how they ended up here is anything but. In 1999 John Joe, a gun enthusiast, was pulled over by state troopers for speeding.

They found several high-powered rifles in his vehicle, but more worryingly were pieces of paper detailing plans to blow up roads throughout Texas.

Ordered out of the van, John Joe bit the arresting officer and tried to steal his gun.

He recalls: “They pulled a gun on me and the other cop said,  ‘If you don’t go down, I’m gonna blow your head off’. Next thing I knew, his wrist came in my mouth and I just bit down on him.”

 

He was charged with assault and attempting to take an officer’s gun but instead of attending court in May 2000 he skipped bail. His main issue was that he might be forced to surrender his guns.

“If you don’t have a gun, you have nothing,” explains his son Jonathan. “Nothing to protect your family or your livestock. We’re not giving up our guns.”

So John Joe fled to the compound, taking his family with him – wife Alicia, their daughters Elizabeth and Ruth, Jonathan and his pregnant wife Cassie plus three children, Melissa, 18, Jessica,17, and Bubba. Their youngest daughter Alicia, now 13, was born on the compound.

To deter raids by the law John Joe sent a chilling letter saying, “If you come after us, just bring extra body bags”.

But the authorities in Texas didn’t want a repeat of the Waco seige of 1993, when 73 members of the Branch Davidian religious cult, including 21 children, were killed in a fire after a two-month armed stand-off with state and federal officers.

Religious: John Joe Gray 
 

John Joe’s daughter Elizabeth says: “We expected them to come in on us and raid us and we would die fighting. We never knew it would go on 15 years.”

Ray Knutt, the sheriff of Gun Barrel, explains the law’s inaction this way: “If we go out to try and get Joe Gray, and the shooting starts, children may get hurt.

“We could end up having to kill innocent bystanders – the kids, or the wife – and we could also get some of our people killed.”

Yet despite the lack of plans to invade, the family remains prepared – and paranoid – in case they do. “We’re ready at any given time, for anything” says Elizabeth.

But the family did let a documentary crew in to film them. America’s Fugitive Family, which airs tonight on Channel 4, takes us beyond the booby-trapped perimeter fence decorated with hand-painted signs warning off intruders.

The most chilling has a noose hanging from it and reads: “Solution to tyranny”.

Indeed, the family view themselves as exiled freedom fighters rather than criminals on the run. John Joe says: “We stand up for what’s right. Good against evil. Eventually, evil has to be taken out.”

But while he, his wife and his grown-up children chose this life for themselves, his grandchildren have had it forced upon them.

Home cooking 
 

Their lives are made up of basic games, chores and prayer. Bubba listens to Christian and country music through a radio powered by a plough he pushes through fields, wittily named “The Walkman”. Not used to conversation with outsiders, their language skills are limited. With dad Jonathan never far away, they also seem scared of giving the wrong answer.

The eldest, Melissa, dreams of visiting a shopping mall again one day and says she’d buy herself “a big fancy dress”. Bubba wishes he had more friends, while Alicia, who has never left the compound in all her 13 years, says: “I kinda just wanna go out and see it. And then come back.”

They’re not even allowed out to school, for the ludicrous reason that Grandma Alicia explains: “There’s no way I wanna see my grandchildren in the public school system. All they’re being taught – let me put this as nicely as I can – is how to be a homo. It’s not right.”

Instead, their mum Cassie has taken on the role of teacher. But when Bubba gives 747 as his answer to 164 plus 10, it’s not her teaching that’s blamed, oh no. Instead he’s deemed “stubborn” and in need of a beating.

The three daughters 
 

Punishment is another part of their lives that seems stuck in the Dark Ages. While Jonathan acknowledges that “you’re not supposed to leave bruises on a kid”, he believes it is the only way to gain respect.

“They will respect you a lot more than if you let them run free doing whatever they want to do,” he says.

When Elizabeth accidentally set a van alight “smoking when I weren’t supposed to”, she was forced to sleep outside in the winter snow for two months.

But as the 15th anniversary of their self-imposed exile approaches, what will become of this family? The younger members can’t help thinking about what they are missing out on. Elizabeth and Ruth would both like husbands, but they’re never allowed out to meet anyone.

Instead they spend hours chatting to men, some as far away as Australia, on the family’s CB radio.

Home schooling 
 

“Peter’s a pretty cool guy,” Elizabeth says of one of her potential suitors. “He’d like to come to America but he’s too scared to fly. You would have to live this life to understand it.” Ruth adds: “Someone godly, who could live this life. We haven’t met him yet.”

Both John Joe and Jonathan claim those old enough can leave any time they want. But when they’re told that if they do they could be arrested, questioned, and even tortured by the authorities, it’s little wonder none have made a break for it.

John Joe believes he’s beaten the system but District Attorney, Doug Lowe, who would prosecute Gray if he ever got to court, disagrees.

“I cannot believe that somebody’s actually capable of living off the grid for that period of time. I’m not sure I could. The interesting thing is, he’s been under arrest longer than the maximum sentence I could’ve given him.”

Who the victor is in this bizarre saga remains to be seen. But the losers are undoubtedly the children.

  • America’s Fugitive Family is on Channel 4 on Wednesday night at 10pm