Reporting
by Capital FM
In his
defense, Steynberg said that he was just trying to economise words because he
had referred to the President as Mr Uhuru Kenyatta in the first mention. He
explained that he did not think it would be necessary to keep using titles while
referring to him in the application. “I should point out that Mr Ruto and Mr
Kenyatta were addressed as such initially and then by way of shorthand were
referred to by surname so it was a question of economy,” he argued. Judge
Eboe-Osuji, however, told him that it was improper to refer to the two Kenyan
leaders using their surnames only. He explained that the Chamber expected both
the Prosecution and the Defence to be civil in the manner in which they
conducted the ICC proceedings adding that common titles were to be used at all
times. The Judge also said that the directive referred to both oral and written
submissions. “You can say Chile Eboe-Osuji the first time and subsequently Mr
Eboe-Osuji repeatedly. That is the convention; let’s follow it,” he said. Khan
had also accused the prosecution of wasting the Court’s time saying that they
based their application to have Ruto’s Thursday excusal from the Court
cancelled on rumours.
The
Prosecution’s application was further thrown out after the Prosecution admitted
that it was moot. The OTP said on Wednesday that it appeared that Ruto was to
lead a Kenyan delegation at the Assembly of State parties at The Hague while
President Uhuru Kenyatta was still away in Kuwait. The Prosecutor argued that
this invalidated Ruto’s excusal, which had been granted to allow him carry out
his presidential functions while Kenyatta was away as the Kenyan Constitution
bars both the President and Deputy from being out of the country at the same
time. But it emerged that Bensouda might have jumped the gun because Ruto left
Kenya on Thursday morning and is scheduled to arrive at The Hague in the
evening so as to make it to Court on Friday, as directed.
No comments:
Post a Comment