French President François Hollande |
by Siji Jabbar
We try to keep a positive vibe going here at This
Is Africa, but every so often you come across something that just paints your
mood black. Some of you may already be aware of this, but if like us you're
hearing about this for the first time your jaw will drop. And it'll probably
raise the same BIG questions in your mind that it did in ours. (Incidentally,
once you read this you'll no longer wonder why French presidents' and ministers
are sometimes greeted by protests when they visit former French colonies in Africa,
even if the protests are about other issues. Though what other issues could be
more important than this one we have no idea.)
Just before France conceded to African demands for independence in the 1960s, it carefully organised its former colonies (CFA countries) in a system of "compulsory solidarity" which consisted of obliging the 14 African states to put 65% of their foreign currency reserves into the French Treasury, plus another 20% for financial liabilities. This means these 14 African countries only ever have access to 15% of their own money! If they need more they have to borrow their own money from the French at commercial rates! And this has been the case since the 1960s
Professor Nicolas Agbohou, Associate Professor at
the
Institute of Cheikh Anta Diop, University of Gabon
|
Believe it or not it gets worse.
France has the first right to buy or reject any
natural resources found in the land of the Francophone countries. So even if
the African countries can get better prices elsewhere, they can't sell to
anybody until France says it doesn't need the resources.
In the award of government contracts, French
companies must be considered first; only after that can these countries look
elsewhere. It doesn’t matter if the CFA countries can obtain better value for
money elsewhere.
Presidents of CFA countries that have tried to
leave the CFA zone have had political and financial pressure put on them by
successive French presidents.
CFA Zone |
Thus, these African states are French taxpayers -
taxed at a staggering rate - yet the citizens of these countries aren't French
and don't have access to the public goods and services their money helps pay
for.
CFA zones are solicited to provide private funding
to French politicians during elections in France.
The above is a summary of an article we came across
in the February issue of the New African (and from an interview given by
Professor Mamadou Koulibaly, Speaker of the Ivorian National Assembly,
Professor of Economics, and author of the book The Servitude of the Colonial
Pact), and we hope they won't mind us sharing it with you influx, so here goes:
THE COLONIAL PACT
It is the Colonial Pact that set up the common
currency for the Francophone countries, the CFA Franc, which demands that each
of the 14 C.F.A member countries must deposit 65% (plus another 20% for
financial liabilities, making the dizzying total of 85%) of their foreign
exchange reserves in an “Operations Account” at the French Treasury in Paris.
The African nations therefore have only access to
15% of their own money for national development in any given year. If they are
in need of extra money, as they always are, they have to borrow from their own
65% in the French Treasury at commercial rates. And that is not all: there is a
cap on the credit extended to each member country equivalent to 20% of their
public revenue in the preceding year. So if the countries need to borrow more
than 20%, too bad; they cannot do it. Amazingly, the final say on the C.F.A
arrangements belongs to the French Treasury, which invests the African
countries’ money in its own name on the Paris Bourse (the stock exchange).
It is also the Colonial Pact that demands that
France has the first right to buy or reject any natural resources found in the
land of the Francophone countries. So even if the African countries could get
better prices elsewhere, they cannot sell to anybody until France says it does
not want to buy those natural resources.
It is, again, the Colonial Pact that demands that
in the award of government contracts in the African countries, French companies
should be considered first; only after that can Africans look elsewhere. It
doesn’t matter if Africans can obtain better value for money elsewhere, French
companies come first, and most often get the contracts. Currently, there is the
awkward case in Abidjan where, before the elections, former president Gbagbo’s
government wanted to build a third major bridge to link the central business
district (called Plateau) to the rest of the city, from which it is separated
by a lagoon. By Colonial Pact tradition, the contract must go to a French
company, which incidentally has quoted an astronomical price – to be paid in
euros or US dollars.
Not happy, Gbagbo’s government sought a second
quote from the Chinese, who offered to build the bridge at half the price
quoted by the French company, and – wait for this – payment would be in cocoa
beans, of which Cote d’Ivoire is the world’s largest producer. But,
unsurprisingly, the French said “non, you can’t do that”.
Overall the Colonial Pact gives the French a
dominant and privileged
position over Francophone Africa, but
in Côte d'Ivoire, the jewel of the former
French possessions in Africa, the French are overly dominant. Outside
parliament, almost all the major utilities - water, electricity, telephone,
transport, ports and major banks - are run by French companies or French
interests. The same story is found in commerce, construction, and agriculture.
In short, the Colonial Pact has created a legal
mechanism under which
France obtains a special place in
the political and economic life of its former colonies.
THE BIG QUESTIONS
In what meaningful way can any of the 14 CFA
countries be said to be independent?
If this isn't illegal and an international crime,
then what is?
What is it going to take for this state of
indentured servitude to end?
How much have the CFA countries lost as a result of
this 50-year (and counting) "agreement"? (Remember, they've had to
borrow their own money from the French at commercial rates)
Do French people know they're living off the wealth
of African countries and have been doing so for over half a century? And if
they know, do they give a damn?
When will France start paying back money they've
sucked from these countries, not only directly from the interest on cash
reserves and loans these countries have had to take out, but also on lost
earnings from the natural resources the countries sold to France below market
rates as well as the lost earnings resulting from awarding contracts to French
companies when other contractors could have done things for less?
Does any such "agreement" exist between
Britain and its former colonies, or did they really let go when they let go?
No comments:
Post a Comment