By VINCENT AGOYA agoya@ke.nationmedia.com
Posted Monday, May 20 2013 at 17:53
Posted Monday, May 20 2013 at 17:53
In Summary
- The group Monday said the charges “lacked sufficient disclosure” and asked the court to declare the case “unconstitutional”, and set them free.
Seventeen
protesters arrested during last week’s anti-MPs-pay-increase demo in
Nairobi have refused to plead to criminal charges pressed against them.
The activists have been slapped with several charges including taking part in an illegal procession and cruelty against animals.
The
group Monday said the charges “lacked sufficient disclosure” and asked
the court to declare the case “unconstitutional”, and set them free.
“The
Constitution demands that anyone arrested should be informed of the
charge, given sufficient details, understand it first before pleading,”
Lawyer Harun Ndumbi for the accused said.
The accused,
he said, were not prepared to answer to half-baked charges and accused
the prosecution of taking a casual approach to the case.
“To try to compel them to answer to such charges would amount to perpetuating an illegality,” he said.
The
charge sheet, which stated that the activists intended to provoke a
breach of peace by releasing a pig, six piglets and pouring “a
blood-like” substance outside Parliament Buildings on May 14, formed the
basis of the lawyer’s contention.
He said without
clear particulars of accusations, the charges remained “vague,
incomplete and dubious,” supposedly trumped up to cause unnecessary
suffering to the suspects.
He further accused police of
locking up the suspects at Central Police Station for over six hour
without telling them the reason for their arrest.
Come clean
“We
are not told who amongst them forwarded the substance... who was in
control of the pigs, who one amongst them had a gallon or gallons of
blood and whether it was human blood, pig blood or merely a substance
coloured red,” the lawyer added.
He demanded that the
police come clean on the ownership and control of the animals, saying
those particulars were necessary in understanding the nature of the
charges pressed against the activists, otherwise they be struck out as
defective.
Mr Ndumbi said the prosecution ought to
divulge the nature of the riot it purports the activists participated in
“and specify which people participated.”
The charge sheet stated that the protesters had blocked a section of Harambee Avenue and caused fear among motorists.
The
prosecution, however, maintained the charges had merit and urged the
suspects to plead with the view of raising objections later.
Nairobi
Chief Magistrate Kiarie Waweru ordered the accused to deposit cash
bails of Sh10,000 each pending a ruling on the objection raised against
the prosecution. Immediately the court ordered the activists to be taken
into custody until their bonds are paid, they started chanting slogans
and songs.
The 17 are alleged to have been part of the
protesters who took Parliament by storm last week to oppose MPs
pay-increase bid. Ruling is on May 23.
No comments:
Post a Comment