The high cost of acquiring land to pave the way for construction of roads could stall such infrastructure projects.
It
is becoming increasingly expensive to make compensation for land,
according to infrastructure principal secretary in the Ministry of Roads
and Infrastructure John Mosonik.
“The cost of land acquisition and related compensation to develop public roads is becoming exorbitant,” Mr Mosonik said.
For
instance, the government spent Sh3 billion to relocate utility
services, make land acquisition and compensate affected people during
the development of an interchange at City Cabanas, Nairobi, along the
Eastern bypass.
He said the cost is further escalated
by relocation of utilities like power lines, water pipes, and service
cables, making public infrastructure costly in the long run. However, a
proposal that would see service providers not related to road
construction meet such costs is being considered.
HASTY COMPLETION
The
ministry also says it will seek allocation of more funds to hasten
compensation and relocation of affected people and utilities.
It
will also expedite the construction of key projects like roads to
improve transport and decongest urban centres. “The measures will
involve working closely with the National Land Commission to quickly
settle issues related to land acquisition, valuation and repossession,”
he said.
The government is in the process of
reclaiming land and making compensations for the dualling of Outer Ring
Road, Nairobi, and other roads under the Nairobi Urban Transport
Improvement Project.
It is also in the process of
reclaiming land and making compensations to facilitate the construction
of the Dongo Kundu bypass in Mombasa.
As part of the
measures the government is undertaking to bring down the cost of
implementing road infrastructure projects, Transport and Infrastructure
cabinet secretary said that a new law is being drafted in consultation
with stakeholders.
Mr. Kamau, who was meeting
stakeholders in the sector last week, said that contractors, some of who
have colluded with government employees, have in a lot of cases,
overstated the cost of projects, which is borne by the taxpayer. Many of
them also end up doing substandard work, adding to the cost of the
project maintenance.
No comments:
Post a Comment